Development of traditional theater forms

The bases of the major dances of India go way back to other classical works in the form of Sanskrit texts like the Natya Shastra with some modifications. This material is roughly dated to between 200 BCE and 200 CE with its credited author being Bharata Muni, an ancient theatrologist and musicologist. Its content includes the theory of rasa, the concept of bhava, and the many forms of expression (including bodily positions, gesticulations, steps, acting methods) to the theory of Tandava dance the attributes of all of which may be found in Indian classical dances.

The origins of the Kathakali may be traced to as far back as the 1st millennium CE or even before that with uncertain marks that point to a beginning of temple and folk arts. It actually started some 400 years ago in a town called Travancore in a southwestern state, Kerala.

This dance form used to follow a tradition that saw male dancers as performers. Modern versions of the Kathakali have female performers as part of their groups. In addition, a marker of its contemporariness are stories, while not fairly recent, are thoroughly recognizable; such as those of Shakespeare or those from other religions.

,The beginnings of Bharatanatyam go back to the presentation of the dance in the courts referred to as Sadir, among other names. Another related performance is the temple worship, devadasis, important in the rituals as part of services in these religious venues. The tradition of music and dance in families performing devadasis along with dance masters called nattuvanars was steadily sustained through the reception of royalties.

The bharatanatyam as a dance form persisted in the context of a temple with principles based on the Natya Shastra. However, the Northern part of India saw a decline in the performances of this particular dance because of foreign invasions which left the people with dances of a mixture type. On the contrary, the people of Southern India were able to preserve the dance through royal patronage and the devadasi system.  

Bharatanatyam greatly suffered under the British rule. The natives were convinced that the traditional art form was inferior to that of the Western introductions and this led to the decline in support from the kings and an overall change in impression that even went as far as claiming performances were borderline prostitution. By the 20th century, with the added campaigns and propaganda of foreign social reformists who took advantage of the shift in perspectives towards the classical art form, the bharatanatyam was seemingly wiped out even in places it was most prominent in.

But, there were families that persevered in the preservation of the Bharatanatyam, at all costs. The recuperation of the dance tradition was at the hands of people coming from different backgrounds. There were people from the West who were interested with the arts of India, the devadasi people who learned both the worship dance and bharatanatyam, and the freedom fighters of the place. Some lawyers were practitioners themselves and they helped in reforming the image of Bharatanatyam. There was also a surge in youth advocates that aided in the possibility for sustainability in the future, then. The sudden swell in awareness towards the dance caused the continuation of trainings for it. Soon, Bharatanatyam became a popular and far reaching Indian classical dance form. In time, it gained international acclaim.